CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) by country

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for...

Countries reporting
83
Highest
4.1 1=low to 6=high
Bhutan
Lowest
1.2 1=low to 6=high
Sudan
Median
3 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,443

What the numbers show

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 83 countries. The highest value is 4.1 1=low to 6=high in Bhutan; the lowest is 1.2 1=low to 6=high in Sudan.

The median across all reporting countries is 3 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 2.96 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 3.

Over the past decade 25 countries rose and 46 fell. The largest increase was in Togo (up 26.9%), and the largest decrease in Sudan (down 45.5%).

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Bhutan 4.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.9% rising
2 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
2 Georgia 4 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 11.1% rising
2 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 2.4% flat
5 Rwanda 3.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.4% rising
6 Cote d'Ivoire 3.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 22.6% rising
7 Armenia 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 2.6% flat
7 Benin 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.1% rising
7 Ghana 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
7 Kenya 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 8.8% rising
7 Saint Lucia 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
7 Tonga 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
7 Uzbekistan 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 15.6% rising
15 India 3.6 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 2.7% flat
16 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 2.8% flat
16 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.4% flat
16 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2015 unchanged flat
19 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 2.9% falling
19 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
19 Mauritania 3.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.2% rising
22 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.7% falling
22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
22 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 13.2% falling
22 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.1% flat
22 Moldova 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2019 down 2.9% flat
22 Mongolia 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2019 down 2.9% flat
22 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 26.9% rising
22 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.5% flat
30 Gambia 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 10.3% rising
30 Guyana 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.2% flat
30 Pakistan 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.2% flat
30 Tuvalu 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
30 Tanzania 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.0% falling
35 Azerbaijan 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2010 down 3.1% flat
35 Bolivia 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 6.1% falling
35 Ethiopia 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.4% flat
35 Kyrgyzstan 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.1% rising
35 Kiribati 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.1% flat
35 Maldives 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Tajikistan 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.9% rising
35 Vanuatu 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.1% flat
43 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.4% flat
43 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 11.1% rising
43 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.1% rising
43 Malawi 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.2% falling
43 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.2% rising
43 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.2% falling
49 Micronesia (country) 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
49 Honduras 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.5% falling
49 Cambodia 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.4% flat
49 Lesotho 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.1% falling
49 Zimbabwe 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.6% rising
54 Congo 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.0% flat
54 Laos 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.7% flat
54 Mozambique 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
54 Niger 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
54 Nepal 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.7% falling
54 Solomon Islands 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.7% rising
54 Sao Tome and Principe 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.7% flat
61 Marshall Islands 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.6% flat
61 Nigeria 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.6% falling
61 Papua New Guinea 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.9% falling
64 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.0% rising
64 Liberia 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 10.3% falling
64 Madagascar 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.7% falling
64 Chad 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.7% rising
64 East Timor 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.0% flat
69 Bangladesh 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 13.8% falling
70 Burundi 2.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.0% falling
70 Central African Republic 2.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 9.1% flat
72 Angola 2.3 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 4.2% falling
72 Mali 2.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 23.3% falling
74 Guinea-Bissau 2.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
74 Nicaragua 2.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
76 Comoros 2.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 19.2% flat
77 Haiti 1.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.8% falling
77 Myanmar 1.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 36.7% falling
79 Somalia 1.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
80 Afghanistan 1.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 32.0% falling
81 Eritrea 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 40.0% falling
82 Yemen 1.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 41.7% falling
83 South Sudan 1.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 23.5% falling
84 Sudan 1.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 45.5% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

About this data

Indicator
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.