CPIA building human resources rating in Pakistan
Pakistan: CPIA building human resources rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA building human resources rating in Pakistan, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia building human resources rating in Pakistan stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of up 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Pakistan peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2009.
Pakistan ranks 39th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 39 Bolivia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Eritrea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Pakistan
- Arms imports 982.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure 2.7% (2024)
- Military expenditure 10.17 billion current USD (2024)
- Armed forces personnel, total 943,000 (2020)
- Armed forces personnel 1.3% (2020)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 90 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Intentional homicides 4.33 per 100,000 people (2023)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 77.83 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Military expenditure 2.83 trillion current LCU (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 17.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia building human resources rating in Pakistan?
- Cpia building human resources rating in Pakistan was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- How does Pakistan rank for cpia building human resources rating?
- Pakistan ranks 39th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.