Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mauritania

Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 40.65 0-100 in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
40.65 0-100
Change on year
down 3.6%
World rank
150th
of 206 countries
All-time high
48.48 0-100
in 2007
All-time low
36.77 0-100
in 2004
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mauritania, 1996–2024

010203040501996201020241996: 40.4 0-1001998: 39.9 0-1002000: 38.7 0-1002002: 42.2 0-1002003: 42.3 0-1002004: 36.8 0-1002005: 40.5 0-1002006: 44.4 0-1002007: 48.5 0-1002008: 42.4 0-1002009: 40.9 0-1002010: 44.6 0-1002011: 45.2 0-1002012: 41.5 0-1002013: 40.3 0-1002014: 40.8 0-1002015: 40.7 0-1002016: 40.7 0-1002017: 39.8 0-1002018: 40.4 0-1002019: 41.6 0-1002020: 42.9 0-1002021: 41.2 0-1002022: 41.4 0-1002023: 42.2 0-1002024: 40.7 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritania is 40.65 0-100, measured in 2024.

The figure is down 3.6% on the previous year and down 0.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritania peaked at 48.48 0-100 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 36.77 0-100, in 2004.

Mauritania ranks 150th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 40.13 0-100 39.88 0-100 40.38 0-100 2
2000s 41.85 0-100 36.77 0-100 48.48 0-100 9
2010s 41.57 0-100 39.85 0-100 45.23 0-100 10
2020s 41.65 0-100 40.65 0-100 42.87 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Mauritania

  1. 147 Kazakhstan 42.57 0-100 compare
  2. 148 United Arab Emirates 41.91 0-100 compare
  3. 149 Oman 41.31 0-100 compare
  4. 151 Qatar 40.15 0-100 compare
  5. 152 Burkina Faso 39.97 0-100 compare
  6. 153 Niger 39.86 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Mauritania

All data for Mauritania →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritania?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritania was 40.65 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mauritania?
The highest recorded value was 48.48 0-100 in 2007.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mauritania?
The lowest recorded value was 36.77 0-100 in 2004.
How does Mauritania rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Mauritania ranks 150th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Mauritania?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mauritania data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).