Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 42.57 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Kazakhstan, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in Kazakhstan is 42.57 0-100, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 2.0% on the previous year and up 3.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Kazakhstan peaked at 44.8 0-100 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 34.21 0-100, in 1996.
That places Kazakhstan 147th out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.17 0-100 | 34.21 0-100 | 38.12 0-100 | 2 |
| 2000s | 40.88 0-100 | 34.61 0-100 | 44.8 0-100 | 9 |
| 2010s | 41.75 0-100 | 39.44 0-100 | 43.34 0-100 | 10 |
| 2020s | 41.8 0-100 | 41.37 0-100 | 42.57 0-100 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 144 El Salvador 43.05 0-100 compare
- 145 Brunei 42.85 0-100 compare
- 146 Kyrgyzstan 42.82 0-100 compare
- 148 United Arab Emirates 41.91 0-100 compare
- 149 Oman 41.31 0-100 compare
- 150 Mauritania 40.65 0-100 compare
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Number of child deaths per woman 0.0229 under-five deaths per woman (2024)
- Fertility rate: births per woman 3.01 live births per woman (2023)
- Fertility rate: births per woman 3.01 live births per woman (2023)
- Fertility rate vs. Human Development Index 3.01 live births per woman (2023)
- Human Development Index 0.837 (2023)
- Rule of Law - Governance score 50.4 0-100 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate -0.3815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate -0.8157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance estimate -0.2828 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance score 61.06 0-100 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance score in Kazakhstan?
- Voice and accountability - governance score in Kazakhstan was 42.57 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 44.8 0-100 in 2008.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 34.21 0-100 in 1996.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 147th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).