Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Latvia

Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 76.59 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
76.59 0-100
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
29th
of 206 countries
All-time high
76.59 0-100
in 2024
All-time low
65.06 0-100
in 1996
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Latvia, 1996–2024

0204060801996201020241996: 65.1 0-1001998: 69.2 0-1002000: 67.1 0-1002002: 67.1 0-1002003: 68.4 0-1002004: 65.8 0-1002005: 69 0-1002006: 70.4 0-1002007: 70.5 0-1002008: 69.6 0-1002009: 71.7 0-1002010: 71.7 0-1002011: 70.2 0-1002012: 69 0-1002013: 69.2 0-1002014: 70.3 0-1002015: 70 0-1002016: 69.5 0-1002017: 69.6 0-1002018: 69.2 0-1002019: 72.8 0-1002020: 73.1 0-1002021: 74.2 0-1002022: 75.5 0-1002023: 76.3 0-1002024: 76.6 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance score in Latvia stood at 76.59 0-100. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.

The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 9.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Latvia peaked at 76.59 0-100 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 65.06 0-100, in 1996.

Latvia ranks 29th of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 67.12 0-100 65.06 0-100 69.19 0-100 2
2000s 68.85 0-100 65.76 0-100 71.73 0-100 9
2010s 70.15 0-100 69.03 0-100 72.84 0-100 10
2020s 75.14 0-100 73.05 0-100 76.59 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 26 Guam 77.43 0-100 compare
  2. 27 France 76.95 0-100 compare
  3. 28 Spain 76.95 0-100 compare
  4. 30 Japan 76.38 0-100 compare
  5. 31 Italy 75.53 0-100 compare
  6. 32 Slovenia 75.35 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Latvia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Latvia was 76.59 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 76.59 0-100 in 2024.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 65.06 0-100 in 1996.
How does Latvia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Latvia ranks 29th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).