IDA resource allocation index in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: IDA resource allocation index was 3.11 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
3.11 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 4.2%
World rank
52nd
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.11 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
All-time low
1.4 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
Years of data
21
2005–2025

IDA resource allocation index in Zimbabwe, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 1.8 1=low to 6=high2006: 1.8 1=low to 6=high2007: 1.6 1=low to 6=high2008: 1.4 1=low to 6=high2009: 1.9 1=low to 6=high2010: 2 1=low to 6=high2011: 2.2 1=low to 6=high2012: 2.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 2.3 1=low to 6=high2014: 2.7 1=low to 6=high2015: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2016: 2.7 1=low to 6=high2017: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2018: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, ida resource allocation index in Zimbabwe stood at 3.11 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is up 4.2% on the previous year and up 8.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Zimbabwe peaked at 3.11 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 1.4 1=low to 6=high, in 2008.

Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.7 1=low to 6=high 1.4 1=low to 6=high 1.86 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 2.54 1=low to 6=high 1.98 1=low to 6=high 2.98 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.01 1=low to 6=high 2.98 1=low to 6=high 3.11 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 49 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.18 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 50 Mali 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 51 Burundi 3.12 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 53 Laos 3.08 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 54 Niger 3.07 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 54 Sierra Leone 3.07 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is ida resource allocation index in Zimbabwe?
Ida resource allocation index in Zimbabwe was 3.11 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 3.11 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 1.4 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
How does Zimbabwe rank for ida resource allocation index?
Zimbabwe ranks 52nd out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).