IDA resource allocation index in Moldova

Moldova: IDA resource allocation index was 3.72 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3.72 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 0.7%
World rank
14th
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.86 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

IDA resource allocation index in Moldova, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.9 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.7 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for ida resource allocation index in Moldova is 3.72 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.7% on the previous year and up 0.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Moldova peaked at 3.86 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

Moldova ranks 14th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.69 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.8 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.76 1=low to 6=high 3.7 1=low to 6=high 3.86 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 11 Bhutan 3.8 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 12 Togo 3.78 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 13 Saint Lucia 3.73 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 15 Grenada 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 15 India 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 17 Vietnam 3.69 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is ida resource allocation index in Moldova?
Ida resource allocation index in Moldova was 3.72 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 3.86 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Moldova rank for ida resource allocation index?
Moldova ranks 14th out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).