IDA resource allocation index in Mauritania
Mauritania: IDA resource allocation index was 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
IDA resource allocation index in Mauritania, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Mauritania recorded 3.65 1=low to 6=high for ida resource allocation index in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.9% on the previous year and up 10.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Mauritania peaked at 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 3.16 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Mauritania ranks 19th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.31 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritania
- 17 Vietnam 3.69 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Azerbaijan 3.68 1=low to 6=high compare
- 20 Kyrgyzstan 3.64 1=low to 6=high compare
- 21 Tanzania 3.62 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Mauritania
- Arms imports 126.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure 2.2% (2024)
- Military expenditure 260.06 million current USD (2024)
- Armed forces personnel, total 21,000 (2020)
- Armed forces personnel 2.0% (2020)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 80 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 62.8 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Military expenditure 10.32 billion current LCU (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 23.3% (2025)
- Military expenditure 9.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ida resource allocation index in Mauritania?
- Ida resource allocation index in Mauritania was 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Mauritania?
- The highest recorded value was 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Mauritania?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.16 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Mauritania rank for ida resource allocation index?
- Mauritania ranks 19th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Mauritania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritania data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).