Statizoid

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Micronesia (country)

Micronesia (country): CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
56th
of 84 countries
All-time high
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2011
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2011
Years of data
15
2011–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Micronesia (country), 2011–2025

01232011201820252011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Micronesia (country) stood at 3 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Micronesia (country) peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.

Micronesia (country) ranks 56th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 9
2020s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)

  1. 56 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 56 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 56 Bolivia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 56 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 56 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 56 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 56 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 56 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 56 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 56 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 56 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 56 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 56 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 56 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 56 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 56 East Timor 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 56 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Micronesia (country)

All data for Micronesia (country) →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Micronesia (country)?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Micronesia (country) was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
How does Micronesia (country) rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Micronesia (country) ranks 56th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.