Statizoid

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Bolivia

Bolivia: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 14.3%
World rank
56th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Bolivia, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Bolivia recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is down 14.3% on the previous year and down 25.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Bolivia peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

That places Bolivia 56th out of 84 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Bolivia

  1. 56 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 56 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 56 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 56 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 56 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 56 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 56 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 56 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 56 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 56 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 56 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 56 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 56 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 56 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 56 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 56 East Timor 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 56 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Bolivia

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Bolivia?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Bolivia was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Bolivia?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Bolivia?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Bolivia rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Bolivia ranks 56th out of 84 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Bolivia?
Over the last ten years it is down 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.