CPIA financial sector rating in Guinea
Guinea: CPIA financial sector rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA financial sector rating in Guinea, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia financial sector rating in Guinea stood at 3 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Guinea peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Guinea 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guinea
- 27 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Benin 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Bhutan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Bolivia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Uzbekistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Vietnam 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Guinea
- Arms imports 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure 2.1% (2024)
- Military expenditure 562.46 million current USD (2024)
- Armed forces personnel, total 13,000 (2020)
- Armed forces personnel 0.3% (2020)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 66.6 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 62.65 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Military expenditure 4.84 trillion current LCU (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 29.6% (2025)
- Military expenditure 12.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Guinea?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Guinea was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Guinea rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Guinea ranks 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.