Statizoid

CPIA financial sector rating in Bolivia

Bolivia: CPIA financial sector rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
27th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA financial sector rating in Bolivia, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia financial sector rating in Bolivia is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is down 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Bolivia peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.

That places Bolivia 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.7 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.25 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Bolivia

  1. 27 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 27 Benin 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 27 Bhutan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 27 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 27 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 27 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 27 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 27 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 27 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 27 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 27 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 27 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 27 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 27 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 27 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 27 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 27 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 27 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 27 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 27 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 27 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 27 Uzbekistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 27 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 27 Vietnam 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 27 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Bolivia

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia financial sector rating in Bolivia?
Cpia financial sector rating in Bolivia was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Bolivia?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Bolivia?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
How does Bolivia rank for cpia financial sector rating?
Bolivia ranks 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Bolivia?
Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.