CPIA economic management cluster average in Vietnam

Vietnam: CPIA economic management cluster average was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3.67 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 8.3%
World rank
24th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA economic management cluster average in Vietnam, 2005–2015

0123452005201020152005: 4.3 1=low to 6=high2006: 4.7 1=low to 6=high2007: 4.3 1=low to 6=high2008: 4.3 1=low to 6=high2009: 4.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.7 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Vietnam recorded 3.67 1=low to 6=high for cpia economic management cluster average in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is down 8.3% on the previous year and down 15.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Vietnam peaked at 4.67 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.67 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

Vietnam ranks 24th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.39 1=low to 6=high 4.3 1=low to 6=high 4.67 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.03 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 4.17 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Vietnam

  1. 21 Kenya 3.83 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 21 Mali 3.83 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 21 Nicaragua 3.83 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 24 Bolivia 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 26 Bhutan 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 26 Cameroon 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 26 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 26 Dominica 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 26 Guinea 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 26 Madagascar 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 26 Nigeria 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 26 Saint Lucia 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 26 Uganda 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Vietnam

All data for Vietnam →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in Vietnam?
Cpia economic management cluster average in Vietnam was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Vietnam?
The highest recorded value was 4.67 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Vietnam?
The lowest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Vietnam rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
Vietnam ranks 24th out of 84 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Vietnam?
Over the last ten years it is down 15.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Vietnam data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.