CPIA economic management cluster average in Uganda

Uganda: CPIA economic management cluster average was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
3.67 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 4.3%
World rank
26th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA economic management cluster average in Uganda, 2005–2025

0123452005201520252005: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 4.3 1=low to 6=high2011: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2012: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2018: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2019: 4.3 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.7 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia economic management cluster average in Uganda stood at 3.67 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of down 4.3% on the previous year and down 12.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Uganda peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.67 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.

Uganda ranks 26th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.5 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.18 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.33 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.83 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Uganda

  1. 24 Bolivia 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 24 Vietnam 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 26 Bhutan 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 26 Cameroon 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 26 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 26 Dominica 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 26 Guinea 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 26 Madagascar 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 26 Nigeria 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 26 Saint Lucia 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Uganda

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in Uganda?
Cpia economic management cluster average in Uganda was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Uganda?
The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Uganda?
The lowest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
How does Uganda rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
Uganda ranks 26th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Uganda?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Uganda data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.