CPIA building human resources rating in Moldova

Moldova: CPIA building human resources rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
17th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA building human resources rating in Moldova, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 4 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia building human resources rating in Moldova is 4 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Moldova peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Moldova 17th out of 84 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 17 Armenia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 17 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 17 Bangladesh 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 17 Burundi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 17 Cameroon 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 17 Chad 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 17 Djibouti 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 17 Ethiopia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 17 Gambia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 17 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 17 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 17 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 17 Malawi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 17 Maldives 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 17 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 17 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 17 Sierra Leone 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 17 Tanzania 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 17 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 17 Vietnam 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 17 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia building human resources rating in Moldova?
Cpia building human resources rating in Moldova was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Moldova rank for cpia building human resources rating?
Moldova ranks 17th out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.