Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Uruguay

Uruguay: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 78.34 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
78.34 0-100
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
23rd
of 206 countries
All-time high
78.81 0-100
in 2020
All-time low
70.98 0-100
in 1996
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Uruguay, 1996–2024

0204060801996201020241996: 71 0-1001998: 72 0-1002000: 73 0-1002002: 74.5 0-1002003: 74 0-1002004: 72.9 0-1002005: 74.3 0-1002006: 76.3 0-1002007: 76.5 0-1002008: 76.8 0-1002009: 77.6 0-1002010: 78.4 0-1002011: 77.9 0-1002012: 76.3 0-1002013: 77 0-1002014: 77 0-1002015: 78 0-1002016: 78.6 0-1002017: 78.4 0-1002018: 78.4 0-1002019: 78.6 0-1002020: 78.8 0-1002021: 78.5 0-1002022: 77.9 0-1002023: 78.2 0-1002024: 78.3 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 78.34 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2024.

The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 1.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Uruguay peaked at 78.81 0-100 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 70.98 0-100, in 1996.

That places Uruguay 23rd out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 71.47 0-100 70.98 0-100 71.96 0-100 2
2000s 75.1 0-100 72.91 0-100 77.64 0-100 9
2010s 77.87 0-100 76.26 0-100 78.6 0-100 10
2020s 78.34 0-100 77.88 0-100 78.81 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 20 Portugal 78.99 0-100 compare
  2. 21 Czechia 78.81 0-100 compare
  3. 22 San Marino 78.66 0-100 compare
  4. 24 Lithuania 78.25 0-100 compare
  5. 25 Tuvalu 77.65 0-100 compare
  6. 26 Guam 77.43 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Uruguay?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Uruguay was 78.34 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 78.81 0-100 in 2020.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 70.98 0-100 in 1996.
How does Uruguay rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Uruguay ranks 23rd out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Uruguay?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).