Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Sudan

South Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 23.74 0-100 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
23.74 0-100
Change on year
down 2.6%
World rank
201st
of 206 countries
All-time high
35.43 0-100
in 2011
All-time low
21.08 0-100
in 2018
Years of data
14
2011–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Sudan, 2011–2024

0102030402011201720242011: 35.4 0-1002012: 34.6 0-1002013: 31.9 0-1002014: 30.3 0-1002015: 29.3 0-1002016: 23.9 0-1002017: 24.2 0-1002018: 21.1 0-1002019: 21.2 0-1002020: 23 0-1002021: 22.9 0-1002022: 22.7 0-1002023: 24.4 0-1002024: 23.7 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance score in South Sudan stood at 23.74 0-100.

That represents a change of down 2.6% on the previous year and down 21.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in South Sudan peaked at 35.43 0-100 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 21.08 0-100, in 2018.

South Sudan ranks 201st of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 27.99 0-100 21.08 0-100 35.43 0-100 9
2020s 23.32 0-100 22.66 0-100 24.37 0-100 5

Countries ranked near South Sudan

  1. 198 Venezuela 25.04 0-100 compare
  2. 199 Syria 24.52 0-100 compare
  3. 200 Sudan 23.88 0-100 compare
  4. 202 North Korea 22.06 0-100 compare
  5. 203 Turkmenistan 21.09 0-100 compare
  6. 204 Myanmar 19.66 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for South Sudan

All data for South Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in South Sudan?
Voice and accountability - governance score in South Sudan was 23.74 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in South Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 35.43 0-100 in 2011.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in South Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 21.08 0-100 in 2018.
How does South Sudan rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
South Sudan ranks 201st out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in South Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is down 21.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this South Sudan data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).