Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia

Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 59.07 0-100 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
59.07 0-100
Change on year
down 1.1%
World rank
92nd
of 206 countries
All-time high
64.65 0-100
in 1998
All-time low
57.68 0-100
in 2012
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 63.1 0-1001998: 64.7 0-1002000: 60.7 0-1002002: 61.2 0-1002003: 61.9 0-1002004: 62.5 0-1002005: 60.7 0-1002006: 61.5 0-1002007: 62.2 0-1002008: 60.7 0-1002009: 60.2 0-1002010: 60.8 0-1002011: 60.4 0-1002012: 57.7 0-1002013: 58.4 0-1002014: 60 0-1002015: 59.9 0-1002016: 60.5 0-1002017: 60.3 0-1002018: 59.7 0-1002019: 59.6 0-1002020: 60 0-1002021: 59.4 0-1002022: 59.2 0-1002023: 59.7 0-1002024: 59.1 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia stood at 59.07 0-100.

That represents a change of down 1.1% on the previous year and down 1.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia peaked at 64.65 0-100 in 1998 and was at its lowest, 57.68 0-100, in 2012.

Mongolia ranks 92nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 63.9 0-100 63.14 0-100 64.65 0-100 2
2000s 61.3 0-100 60.24 0-100 62.51 0-100 9
2010s 59.73 0-100 57.68 0-100 60.81 0-100 10
2020s 59.5 0-100 59.07 0-100 60.03 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 89 Dominican Republic 60.37 0-100 compare
  2. 90 Sao Tome and Principe 59.73 0-100 compare
  3. 93 Armenia 58.95 0-100 compare
  4. 94 Belize 58.67 0-100 compare
  5. 95 North Macedonia 58.14 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia was 59.07 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 64.65 0-100 in 1998.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 57.68 0-100 in 2012.
How does Mongolia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Mongolia ranks 92nd out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).