Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Ecuador

Ecuador: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 55.01 0-100 in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
55.01 0-100
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
106th
of 206 countries
All-time high
55.94 0-100
in 2007
All-time low
49.74 0-100
in 2015
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Ecuador, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 54 0-1001998: 54.9 0-1002000: 50.7 0-1002002: 54.3 0-1002003: 54.9 0-1002004: 54.4 0-1002005: 54 0-1002006: 54.5 0-1002007: 55.9 0-1002008: 54.4 0-1002009: 54.5 0-1002010: 53.9 0-1002011: 53.6 0-1002012: 50.9 0-1002013: 50.6 0-1002014: 51.3 0-1002015: 49.7 0-1002016: 50.3 0-1002017: 51.1 0-1002018: 54 0-1002019: 54.4 0-1002020: 54.1 0-1002021: 55.5 0-1002022: 55.3 0-1002023: 54.7 0-1002024: 55 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in Ecuador is 55.01 0-100, measured in 2024.

The figure is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 7.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Ecuador peaked at 55.94 0-100 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 49.74 0-100, in 2015.

Ecuador ranks 106th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 54.46 0-100 53.99 0-100 54.92 0-100 2
2000s 54.19 0-100 50.73 0-100 55.94 0-100 9
2010s 51.99 0-100 49.74 0-100 54.37 0-100 10
2020s 54.91 0-100 54.06 0-100 55.53 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 103 Hungary 56.36 0-100 compare
  2. 104 Nepal 55.8 0-100 compare
  3. 105 India 55.47 0-100 compare
  4. 107 Guyana 54.97 0-100 compare
  5. 108 Malawi 54.93 0-100 compare
  6. 109 Ukraine 54.91 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Ecuador?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Ecuador was 55.01 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 55.94 0-100 in 2007.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 49.74 0-100 in 2015.
How does Ecuador rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Ecuador ranks 106th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 7.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).