Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Croatia

Croatia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 68.2 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
68.2 0-100
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
58th
of 206 countries
All-time high
68.52 0-100
in 2004
All-time low
47.55 0-100
in 1998
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Croatia, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 48.4 0-1001998: 47.5 0-1002000: 61.3 0-1002002: 64.8 0-1002003: 65.8 0-1002004: 68.5 0-1002005: 68.2 0-1002006: 68.2 0-1002007: 68.4 0-1002008: 66.9 0-1002009: 67.6 0-1002010: 67.1 0-1002011: 65.7 0-1002012: 66.9 0-1002013: 65.8 0-1002014: 66.2 0-1002015: 67.1 0-1002016: 66.1 0-1002017: 64.8 0-1002018: 63.6 0-1002019: 64.5 0-1002020: 66.8 0-1002021: 67.2 0-1002022: 67.2 0-1002023: 67.9 0-1002024: 68.2 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Croatia recorded 68.2 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2024.

The figure is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 3.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Croatia peaked at 68.52 0-100 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 47.55 0-100, in 1998.

Croatia ranks 58th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 47.95 0-100 47.55 0-100 48.36 0-100 2
2000s 66.62 0-100 61.25 0-100 68.52 0-100 9
2010s 65.79 0-100 63.63 0-100 67.12 0-100 10
2020s 67.47 0-100 66.84 0-100 68.2 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Croatia

  1. 55 Greece 70.53 0-100 compare
  2. 56 Poland 70.01 0-100 compare
  3. 57 New Caledonia 69.64 0-100 compare
  4. 59 Seychelles 67.95 0-100 compare
  5. 60 Saint Lucia 67.55 0-100 compare
  6. 61 South Africa 67.48 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Croatia

All data for Croatia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Croatia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Croatia was 68.2 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Croatia?
The highest recorded value was 68.52 0-100 in 2004.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Croatia?
The lowest recorded value was 47.55 0-100 in 1998.
How does Croatia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Croatia ranks 58th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Croatia?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Croatia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).