Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in China
China: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▬ Flat
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in China, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
China recorded -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 21.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in China peaked at -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014 and was at its lowest, -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2024.
China ranks 192nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
More reference data data for China
- Number of child deaths per woman 0.0096 under-five deaths per woman (2024)
- Fertility rate: births per woman 0.999 live births per woman (2023)
- Fertility rate: births per woman 0.999 live births per woman (2023)
- Fertility rate vs. Human Development Index 0.999 live births per woman (2023)
- Human Development Index 0.797 (2023)
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate -0.5793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance score 46.99 0-100 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score 27.91 0-100 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance score 63.28 0-100 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance estimate -0.1533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in China?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in China was -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- How does China rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- China ranks 192nd out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.