Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure was 75 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
75 scale 0-100
Change on year
up 15.4%
World rank
69th
of 191 countries
All-time high
75 scale 0-100
in 2024
All-time low
60 scale 0-100
in 2021
Years of data
9
2016–2024

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure in Kazakhstan, 2016–2024

0204060802016202020242016: 70 scale 0-1002017: 70 scale 0-1002018: 70 scale 0-1002019: 70 scale 0-1002020: 70 scale 0-1002021: 60 scale 0-1002022: 60 scale 0-1002023: 65 scale 0-1002024: 75 scale 0-100

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure in Kazakhstan stood at 75 scale 0-100. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 15.4% on the previous year and up 7.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure in Kazakhstan peaked at 75 scale 0-100 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 60 scale 0-100, in 2021.

That places Kazakhstan 69th out of 191 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 70 scale 0-100 70 scale 0-100 70 scale 0-100 4
2020s 66 scale 0-100 60 scale 0-100 75 scale 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 69 Bahamas 75 scale 0-100 compare
  2. 69 Egypt 75 scale 0-100 compare
  3. 69 Indonesia 75 scale 0-100 compare
  4. 69 Malta 75 scale 0-100 compare
  5. 69 Peru 75 scale 0-100 compare
  6. 69 Serbia 75 scale 0-100 compare
  7. 69 Uruguay 75 scale 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 195 places →

More public sector data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure in Kazakhstan?
Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure in Kazakhstan was 75 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 75 scale 0-100 in 2024.
What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 60 scale 0-100 in 2021.
How does Kazakhstan rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
Kazakhstan ranks 69th out of 191 countries with data for 2024.
Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 1,746 data points, 2016–2024
Last refreshed

The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.