Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Georgia

Georgia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score was 81.1 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
81.1 scale 0-100
Change on year
up 2.3%
World rank
29th
of 182 countries
All-time high
81.1 scale 0-100
in 2024
All-time low
66.92 scale 0-100
in 2017
Years of data
10
2015–2024

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Georgia, 2015–2024

0204060802015201920242015: 74.4 scale 0-1002016: 71 scale 0-1002017: 66.9 scale 0-1002018: 68.5 scale 0-1002019: 68.5 scale 0-1002020: 70.8 scale 0-1002021: 77.5 scale 0-1002022: 79.2 scale 0-1002023: 79.2 scale 0-1002024: 81.1 scale 0-100

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Georgia stood at 81.1 scale 0-100. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.3% on the previous year and up 8.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Georgia peaked at 81.1 scale 0-100 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 66.92 scale 0-100, in 2017.

That places Georgia 29th out of 182 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 69.86 scale 0-100 66.92 scale 0-100 74.44 scale 0-100 5
2020s 77.57 scale 0-100 70.82 scale 0-100 81.1 scale 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 26 Chile 81.28 scale 0-100 compare
  2. 27 Netherlands 81.25 scale 0-100 compare
  3. 28 Costa Rica 81.17 scale 0-100 compare
  4. 30 Mongolia 80.96 scale 0-100 compare
  5. 31 Bulgaria 80.75 scale 0-100 compare
  6. 32 New Zealand 80.67 scale 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More public sector data for Georgia

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Georgia?
Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Georgia was 81.1 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 81.1 scale 0-100 in 2024.
What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 66.92 scale 0-100 in 2017.
How does Georgia rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Georgia ranks 29th out of 182 countries with data for 2024.
Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.