Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score was 66.6 scale 0-100 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Afghanistan, 2004–2024
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.
Analysis
In 2024, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Afghanistan stood at 66.6 scale 0-100.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 122.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Afghanistan peaked at 80 scale 0-100 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 20 scale 0-100, in 2004.
Afghanistan ranks 143rd of 217 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 scale 0-100 | 20 scale 0-100 | 20 scale 0-100 | 6 |
| 2010s | 46 scale 0-100 | 20 scale 0-100 | 70 scale 0-100 | 10 |
| 2020s | 74.64 scale 0-100 | 66.6 scale 0-100 | 80 scale 0-100 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
More public sector data for Afghanistan
- Arms imports 65.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Tax revenue 9.9% (2017)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 4.5% (2017)
- Taxes on goods and services 8.6% (2017)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 8.5% (2017)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 0.4% (2017)
- Interest payments 0.1% (2017)
- Grants and other revenue 78.8% (2017)
- Interest payments 0.1% (2017)
- Other taxes 0.0% (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Afghanistan?
- Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Afghanistan was 66.6 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 80 scale 0-100 in 2020.
- What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 scale 0-100 in 2004.
- How does Afghanistan rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score?
- Afghanistan ranks 143rd out of 217 countries with data for 2024.
- Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 122.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.