Regulatory Quality - Governance score in North Macedonia

North Macedonia: Regulatory Quality - Governance score was 59.06 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
59.06 0-100
Change on year
up 1.8%
World rank
74th
of 204 countries
All-time high
61.15 0-100
in 2018
All-time low
45.79 0-100
in 1996
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Regulatory Quality - Governance score in North Macedonia, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 45.8 0-1001998: 46 0-1002000: 46.6 0-1002002: 49.9 0-1002003: 50.6 0-1002004: 52.9 0-1002005: 51.9 0-1002006: 56 0-1002007: 56.9 0-1002008: 57.4 0-1002009: 58 0-1002010: 53.1 0-1002011: 53.5 0-1002012: 58.2 0-1002013: 57.2 0-1002014: 59.3 0-1002015: 59.1 0-1002016: 59.2 0-1002017: 60.3 0-1002018: 61.2 0-1002019: 57.9 0-1002020: 59.6 0-1002021: 58.4 0-1002022: 58.4 0-1002023: 58 0-1002024: 59.1 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

North Macedonia recorded 59.06 0-100 for regulatory quality - governance score in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.8% on the previous year and down 0.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance score in North Macedonia peaked at 61.15 0-100 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 45.79 0-100, in 1996.

That places North Macedonia 74th out of 204 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 45.87 0-100 45.79 0-100 45.96 0-100 2
2000s 53.35 0-100 46.65 0-100 57.96 0-100 9
2010s 57.88 0-100 53.1 0-100 61.15 0-100 10
2020s 58.7 0-100 58.04 0-100 59.65 0-100 5

Countries ranked near North Macedonia

  1. 71 Croatia 59.37 0-100 compare
  2. 72 Jordan 59.22 0-100 compare
  3. 73 Rwanda 59.11 0-100 compare
  4. 75 Dominican Republic 58.13 0-100 compare
  5. 76 Saint Lucia 57.73 0-100 compare
  6. 77 Armenia 57.04 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places →

More reference data data for North Macedonia

All data for North Macedonia →

Frequently asked questions

What is regulatory quality - governance score in North Macedonia?
Regulatory quality - governance score in North Macedonia was 59.06 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest regulatory quality - governance score recorded in North Macedonia?
The highest recorded value was 61.15 0-100 in 2018.
What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance score recorded in North Macedonia?
The lowest recorded value was 45.79 0-100 in 1996.
How does North Macedonia rank for regulatory quality - governance score?
North Macedonia ranks 74th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
Is regulatory quality - governance score rising or falling in North Macedonia?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).