Regulatory Quality - Governance score in Malaysia

Malaysia: Regulatory Quality - Governance score was 65.59 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
65.59 0-100
Change on year
up 2.3%
World rank
48th
of 204 countries
All-time high
68.79 0-100
in 2014
All-time low
61.04 0-100
in 1998
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Regulatory Quality - Governance score in Malaysia, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 62.1 0-1001998: 61 0-1002000: 61.3 0-1002002: 63.8 0-1002003: 66.2 0-1002004: 63.9 0-1002005: 63.7 0-1002006: 65.6 0-1002007: 66.2 0-1002008: 64.5 0-1002009: 62.8 0-1002010: 65.2 0-1002011: 63.1 0-1002012: 66.8 0-1002013: 68.2 0-1002014: 68.8 0-1002015: 66.9 0-1002016: 66.4 0-1002017: 66.9 0-1002018: 66.7 0-1002019: 66.8 0-1002020: 64.9 0-1002021: 66.4 0-1002022: 65.2 0-1002023: 64.1 0-1002024: 65.6 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Malaysia recorded 65.59 0-100 for regulatory quality - governance score in 2024.

That represents a change of up 2.3% on the previous year and down 4.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance score in Malaysia peaked at 68.79 0-100 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 61.04 0-100, in 1998.

Malaysia ranks 48th of 204 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 61.58 0-100 61.04 0-100 62.12 0-100 2
2000s 64.23 0-100 61.33 0-100 66.24 0-100 9
2010s 66.57 0-100 63.14 0-100 68.79 0-100 10
2020s 65.25 0-100 64.14 0-100 66.37 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Malaysia

  1. 45 Saudi Arabia 66.06 0-100 compare
  2. 46 Oman 65.71 0-100 compare
  3. 47 Poland 65.68 0-100 compare
  4. 49 Puerto Rico 65.16 0-100 compare
  5. 50 Georgia 65.11 0-100 compare
  6. 51 Uruguay 65.06 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places →

More reference data data for Malaysia

All data for Malaysia →

Frequently asked questions

What is regulatory quality - governance score in Malaysia?
Regulatory quality - governance score in Malaysia was 65.59 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest regulatory quality - governance score recorded in Malaysia?
The highest recorded value was 68.79 0-100 in 2014.
What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance score recorded in Malaysia?
The lowest recorded value was 61.04 0-100 in 1998.
How does Malaysia rank for regulatory quality - governance score?
Malaysia ranks 48th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
Is regulatory quality - governance score rising or falling in Malaysia?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Malaysia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).