Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Belarus
Belarus: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Belarus, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus stood at -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.9% on the previous year and down 37.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus peaked at -0.5076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Belarus ranks 184th of 204 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.9558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.9922 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 181 Congo -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 182 Zimbabwe -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 183 Guinea-Bissau -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 185 Comoros -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 186 Bolivia -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 187 Central African Republic -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Number of child deaths per woman 0.0041 under-five deaths per woman (2024)
- Fertility rate vs. Human Development Index 1.21 live births per woman (2023)
- Fertility rate: births per woman 1.21 live births per woman (2023)
- Fertility rate: births per woman 1.21 live births per woman (2023)
- Human Development Index 0.824 (2023)
- Rule of Law - Governance score 35.79 0-100 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score 27.26 0-100 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance score 59.45 0-100 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus was -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was -0.5076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Belarus rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Belarus ranks 184th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.