Statizoid

PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Ta in Namibia

Namibia: PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Ta was 0.0% in 2017. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2017)
0.0%
World rank
92nd
of 194 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 2005
All-time low
0.0%
in 1990
Years of data
12
1990–2017

PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Ta in Namibia, 1990–2017

00.0010.0010.0021990200320171990: 0 % of total1995: 0 % of total2000: 0 % of total2005: 0.001 % of total2010: 0 % of total2011: 0 % of total2012: 0 % of total2013: 0 % of total2014: 0 % of total2015: 0 % of total2016: 0 % of total2017: 0 % of total

Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Measured in % of total.

Analysis

In 2017, pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta in Namibia stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta in Namibia peaked at 0.0% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1990.

That places Namibia 92nd out of 194 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 89 United States 0.0% compare
  2. 90 Zambia 0.0% compare
  3. 91 Lebanon 0.0% compare
  4. 92 Albania 0.0% compare
  5. 92 American Samoa 0.0% compare
  6. 92 Andorra 0.0% compare
  7. 92 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0% compare
  8. 92 Australia 0.0% compare
  9. 92 Austria 0.0% compare
  10. 92 Bahamas 0.0% compare
  11. 92 Barbados 0.0% compare
  12. 92 Belgium 0.0% compare
  13. 92 Belize 0.0% compare
  14. 92 Bermuda 0.0% compare
  15. 92 Bolivia 0.0% compare
  16. 92 Botswana 0.0% compare
  17. 92 Brunei 0.0% compare
  18. 92 Cambodia 0.0% compare
  19. 92 Canada 0.0% compare
  20. 92 Colombia 0.0% compare
  21. 92 Comoros 0.0% compare
  22. 92 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
  23. 92 Croatia 0.0% compare
  24. 92 Cuba 0.0% compare
  25. 92 Cyprus 0.0% compare
  26. 92 Czechia 0.0% compare
  27. 92 Denmark 0.0% compare
  28. 92 Dominica 0.0% compare
  29. 92 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
  30. 92 Ecuador 0.0% compare
  31. 92 El Salvador 0.0% compare
  32. 92 Estonia 0.0% compare
  33. 92 Eswatini 0.0% compare
  34. 92 Fiji 0.0% compare
  35. 92 Finland 0.0% compare
  36. 92 France 0.0% compare
  37. 92 Germany 0.0% compare
  38. 92 Greenland 0.0% compare
  39. 92 Grenada 0.0% compare
  40. 92 Guam 0.0% compare
  41. 92 Guatemala 0.0% compare
  42. 92 Guinea 0.0% compare
  43. 92 Guinea-Bissau 0.0% compare
  44. 92 Guyana 0.0% compare
  45. 92 Haiti 0.0% compare
  46. 92 Honduras 0.0% compare
  47. 92 Hungary 0.0% compare
  48. 92 Iceland 0.0% compare
  49. 92 Ireland 0.0% compare
  50. 92 Italy 0.0% compare
  51. 92 Jamaica 0.0% compare
  52. 92 Japan 0.0% compare
  53. 92 Kazakhstan 0.0% compare
  54. 92 Kiribati 0.0% compare
  55. 92 South Korea 0.0% compare
  56. 92 Latvia 0.0% compare
  57. 92 Liberia 0.0% compare
  58. 92 Lithuania 0.0% compare
  59. 92 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
  60. 92 Madagascar 0.0% compare
  61. 92 Malawi 0.0% compare
  62. 92 Malaysia 0.0% compare
  63. 92 Maldives 0.0% compare
  64. 92 Malta 0.0% compare
  65. 92 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
  66. 92 Mauritius 0.0% compare
  67. 92 Micronesia (country) 0.0% compare
  68. 92 Moldova 0.0% compare
  69. 92 Mozambique 0.0% compare
  70. 92 Netherlands 0.0% compare
  71. 92 New Zealand 0.0% compare
  72. 92 Nicaragua 0.0% compare
  73. 92 Northern Mariana Islands 0.0% compare
  74. 92 Norway 0.0% compare
  75. 92 Panama 0.0% compare
  76. 92 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
  77. 92 Paraguay 0.0% compare
  78. 92 Philippines 0.0% compare
  79. 92 Portugal 0.0% compare
  80. 92 Puerto Rico 0.0% compare
  81. 92 Romania 0.0% compare
  82. 92 Samoa 0.0% compare
  83. 92 Seychelles 0.0% compare
  84. 92 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
  85. 92 Singapore 0.0% compare
  86. 92 Slovakia 0.0% compare
  87. 92 Slovenia 0.0% compare
  88. 92 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
  89. 92 Spain 0.0% compare
  90. 92 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
  91. 92 Saint Lucia 0.0% compare
  92. 92 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
  93. 92 Suriname 0.0% compare
  94. 92 Sweden 0.0% compare
  95. 92 Switzerland 0.0% compare
  96. 92 East Timor 0.0% compare
  97. 92 Tonga 0.0% compare
  98. 92 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
  99. 92 Ukraine 0.0% compare
  100. 92 United Kingdom 0.0% compare
  101. 92 Uruguay 0.0% compare
  102. 92 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
  103. 92 Venezuela 0.0% compare
  104. 92 United States Virgin Islands 0.0% compare
  105. 92 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare

See the full ranking of 194 places →

More environment data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta in Namibia?
Pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta in Namibia was 0.0% in 2017, according to Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).
What is the highest pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 2005.
What is the lowest pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1990.
How does Namibia rank for pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta?
Namibia ranks 92nd out of 194 countries with data for 2017.
Is pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim ta rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as part of PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total)
Unit
% of total
Source
Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 2,328 data points, 1990–2017
Last refreshed

Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) Interim Target 1 (IT-1) is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 35 micrograms per cubic meter. The Air Quality Guideline (AQG) of 10 micrograms per cubic meter is recommended by the WHO as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.