Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in World

World: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process was 2.8 1=low to 5=high in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
2.8 1=low to 5=high
All-time high
2.8 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
All-time low
2.56 1=low to 5=high
in 2007
Years of data
7
2007–2022

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in World, 2007–2022

01232007201420222007: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2010: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.7 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.7 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.7 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.7 1=low to 5=high2022: 2.8 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

In 2022, logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in World stood at 2.8 1=low to 5=high. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in World peaked at 2.8 1=low to 5=high in 2022 and was at its lowest, 2.56 1=low to 5=high, in 2007.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.56 1=low to 5=high 2.56 1=low to 5=high 2.56 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.67 1=low to 5=high 2.59 1=low to 5=high 2.73 1=low to 5=high 5
2020s 2.8 1=low to 5=high 2.8 1=low to 5=high 2.8 1=low to 5=high 1

More private sector data for World

All data for World →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in World?
Logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in World was 2.8 1=low to 5=high in 2022, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in World?
The highest recorded value was 2.8 1=low to 5=high in 2022.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in World?
The lowest recorded value was 2.56 1=low to 5=high in 2007.
Is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process rising or falling in World?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this World data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.