Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Niger
Niger: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process was 1.77 1=low to 5=high in 2018. ▲ Rising
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Niger, 2007–2018
Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.
Analysis
Niger recorded 1.77 1=low to 5=high for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in 2018.
The figure is down 31.6% on the previous year and up 6.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Niger peaked at 2.67 1=low to 5=high in 2012 and was at its lowest, 1.67 1=low to 5=high, in 2007.
That places Niger 152nd out of 156 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.67 1=low to 5=high | 1.67 1=low to 5=high | 1.67 1=low to 5=high | 1 |
| 2010s | 2.31 1=low to 5=high | 1.77 1=low to 5=high | 2.67 1=low to 5=high | 5 |
Countries ranked near Niger
More private sector data for Niger
- Merchandise exports 1.90 billion current US$ (2025)
- Manufactures exports 7.3% (2024)
- Food exports 4.1% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 2.70 billion current US$ (2025)
- Manufactures imports 47.5% (2024)
- Food imports 37.9% (2024)
- Merchandise trade 21.3% (2025)
- Commercial service exports 221.76 million current US$ (2024)
- Transport services 57.7% (2024)
- Computer, communications and other services 32.0% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Niger?
- Logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Niger was 1.77 1=low to 5=high in 2018, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in Niger?
- The highest recorded value was 2.67 1=low to 5=high in 2012.
- What is the lowest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in Niger?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.67 1=low to 5=high in 2007.
- How does Niger rank for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
- Niger ranks 152nd out of 156 countries with data for 2018.
- Is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process rising or falling in Niger?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Niger data come from?
- The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.