Food production index in Guinea-Bissau

Guinea-Bissau: Food production index was 122.25 2014-2016 = 100 in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
122.25 2014-2016 = 100
Change on year
up 1.1%
World rank
40th
of 195 countries
All-time high
122.25 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
All-time low
25.24 2014-2016 = 100
in 1971
Years of data
62
1961–2022

Food production index in Guinea-Bissau, 1961–2022

20406080100120196119912022

Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Measured in 2014-2016 = 100.

Analysis

Guinea-Bissau recorded 122.25 2014-2016 = 100 for food production index in 2022. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.1% on the previous year and up 24.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, food production index in Guinea-Bissau peaked at 122.25 2014-2016 = 100 in 2022 and was at its lowest, 25.24 2014-2016 = 100, in 1971.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 40th of 195 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 62 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 30.72 2014-2016 = 100 26.93 2014-2016 = 100 34.19 2014-2016 = 100 9
1970s 29.66 2014-2016 = 100 25.24 2014-2016 = 100 35.06 2014-2016 = 100 10
1980s 40.38 2014-2016 = 100 32.82 2014-2016 = 100 46.03 2014-2016 = 100 10
1990s 54.5 2014-2016 = 100 48.46 2014-2016 = 100 62.98 2014-2016 = 100 10
2000s 75.44 2014-2016 = 100 66.27 2014-2016 = 100 90.83 2014-2016 = 100 10
2010s 101.14 2014-2016 = 100 92.48 2014-2016 = 100 112.35 2014-2016 = 100 10
2020s 119.98 2014-2016 = 100 116.72 2014-2016 = 100 122.25 2014-2016 = 100 3

Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau

  1. 37 Nepal 123.18 2014-2016 = 100 compare
  2. 38 Democratic Republic of Congo 122.79 2014-2016 = 100 compare
  3. 39 Pakistan 122.43 2014-2016 = 100 compare
  4. 41 Cote d'Ivoire 121.86 2014-2016 = 100 compare
  5. 42 Zimbabwe 121.68 2014-2016 = 100 compare
  6. 43 Micronesia (country) 121.63 2014-2016 = 100 compare

See the full ranking of 242 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Guinea-Bissau

All data for Guinea-Bissau →

Frequently asked questions

What is food production index in Guinea-Bissau?
Food production index in Guinea-Bissau was 122.25 2014-2016 = 100 in 2022, according to FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
What is the highest food production index recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The highest recorded value was 122.25 2014-2016 = 100 in 2022.
What is the lowest food production index recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The lowest recorded value was 25.24 2014-2016 = 100 in 1971.
How does Guinea-Bissau rank for food production index?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 40th out of 195 countries with data for 2022.
Is food production index rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
Over the last ten years it is up 24.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
The figures come from FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as part of Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit
2014-2016 = 100
Source
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
242 places, 13,707 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.