Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Jordan

Jordan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP was -100,000 current LCU in 2007. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2007)
-100,000 current LCU
World rank
138th
of 185 countries
All-time high
300,000 current LCU
in 2005
All-time low
-31.17 million current LCU
in 1993
Years of data
32
1976–2007

Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Jordan, 1976–2007

-30.0M-20.0M-10.0M01976199120071976: -100.0k current LCU1977: 0 current LCU1978: -100.0k current LCU1979: 0 current LCU1980: 100.0k current LCU1981: -100.0k current LCU1982: 200.0k current LCU1983: 0 current LCU1984: -0 current LCU1985: 0 current LCU1986: 0 current LCU1987: -100.0k current LCU1988: 0 current LCU1989: 100.0k current LCU1990: 100.0k current LCU1991: 0 current LCU1992: -29.2M current LCU1993: -31.2M current LCU1994: -29.1M current LCU1995: 100.0k current LCU1996: 299.9k current LCU1997: -1.7M current LCU1998: -1.3M current LCU1999: -1.0M current LCU2000: 0 current LCU2001: -100.0k current LCU2002: 0 current LCU2003: -100.0k current LCU2004: 200.0k current LCU2005: 300.0k current LCU2006: 0 current LCU2007: -100.0k current LCU

Source: Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Measured in current LCU.

Analysis

In 2007, discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Jordan stood at -100,000 current LCU.

That represents a change of up 94.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Jordan peaked at 300,000 current LCU in 2005 and was at its lowest, -31.17 million current LCU, in 1993.

Jordan ranks 138th of 185 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s -50,000 current LCU -100,000 current LCU 0 current LCU 4
1980s 20,000 current LCU -100,000 current LCU 200,000 current LCU 10
1990s -9.30 million current LCU -31.17 million current LCU 299,900 current LCU 10
2000s 25,000 current LCU -100,000 current LCU 300,000 current LCU 8

Countries ranked near Jordan

  1. 135 Equatorial Guinea -27,700 current LCU compare
  2. 136 Namibia -27,717 current LCU compare
  3. 137 Cyprus -34,000 current LCU compare
  4. 138 Fiji -100,000 current LCU compare
  5. 138 France -100,000 current LCU compare
  6. 138 Italy -100,000 current LCU compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More economy & growth data for Jordan

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Jordan?
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Jordan was -100,000 current LCU in 2007, according to Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks.
What is the highest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp recorded in Jordan?
The highest recorded value was 300,000 current LCU in 2005.
What is the lowest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp recorded in Jordan?
The lowest recorded value was -31.17 million current LCU in 1993.
How does Jordan rank for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
Jordan ranks 138th out of 185 countries with data for 2007.
Is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp rising or falling in Jordan?
Over the last ten years it is up 94.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Jordan data come from?
The figures come from Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as part of Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 8,481 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.