CPIA social protection rating in Grenada

Grenada: CPIA social protection rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2018
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA social protection rating in Grenada, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 4 1=low to 6=high2022: 4 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4 1=low to 6=high2025: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia social protection rating in Grenada is 4 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is up 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia social protection rating in Grenada peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2018 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Grenada 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.6 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Grenada

  1. 1 Armenia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 1 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 1 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 1 Georgia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 1 Maldives 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 1 Nigeria 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 1 Rwanda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 1 Tanzania 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Grenada

All data for Grenada →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia social protection rating in Grenada?
Cpia social protection rating in Grenada was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia social protection rating recorded in Grenada?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2018.
What is the lowest cpia social protection rating recorded in Grenada?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Grenada rank for cpia social protection rating?
Grenada ranks 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia social protection rating rising or falling in Grenada?
Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Grenada data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,439 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.