Statizoid

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Cameroon

Cameroon: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 12.5%
World rank
38th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Cameroon, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 4 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 4 1=low to 6=high2022: 4 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Cameroon recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of down 12.5% on the previous year and down 12.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Cameroon peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.

Cameroon ranks 38th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.92 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Cameroon

  1. 38 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 38 Central African Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 38 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 38 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 38 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 38 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 38 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 38 Haiti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 38 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 38 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 38 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 38 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 38 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 38 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 38 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 38 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 38 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Cameroon

All data for Cameroon →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Cameroon?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Cameroon was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Cameroon?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Cameroon?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
How does Cameroon rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Cameroon ranks 38th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Cameroon?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Cameroon data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.