CPIA gender equality rating in Moldova
Moldova: CPIA gender equality rating was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▼ Falling
CPIA gender equality rating in Moldova, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Moldova recorded 4.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia gender equality rating in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is down 10.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Moldova peaked at 5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 4.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Moldova 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.65 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
More public sector data for Moldova
- Tax revenue 18.6% (2023)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 12.4% (2023)
- Taxes on goods and services 44.4% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 1.7% (2023)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -5.0% (2023)
- Interest payments 5.6% (2023)
- Grants and other revenue 9.5% (2023)
- Interest payments 5.1% (2023)
- Other taxes 0.0% (2023)
- Compensation of employees 9.5% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Moldova?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Moldova was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Moldova rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Moldova ranks 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.