CPIA gender equality rating in IBRD only

IBRD only: CPIA gender equality rating was 4.25 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
4.25 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
All-time high
4.25 1=low to 6=high
in 2014
All-time low
3.96 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA gender equality rating in IBRD only, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4.1 1=low to 6=high2008: 4.1 1=low to 6=high2009: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2010: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2011: 4.1 1=low to 6=high2012: 4.1 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2017: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2018: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2019: 4.2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

IBRD only recorded 4.25 1=low to 6=high for cpia gender equality rating in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is up 2.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in IBRD only peaked at 4.25 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.96 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.05 1=low to 6=high 3.96 1=low to 6=high 4.15 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.18 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.25 1=low to 6=high 10

More public sector data for IBRD only

All data for IBRD only →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia gender equality rating in IBRD only?
Cpia gender equality rating in IBRD only was 4.25 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in IBRD only?
The highest recorded value was 4.25 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in IBRD only?
The lowest recorded value was 3.96 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in IBRD only?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this IBRD only data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.