CPIA fiscal policy rating in Chad
Chad: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Chad, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia fiscal policy rating in Chad is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.7% on the previous year and up 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Chad peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2007.
That places Chad 18th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.85 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chad
- 18 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Bolivia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Chad
- Arms imports 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure 3.0% (2024)
- Military expenditure 557.71 million current USD (2024)
- Armed forces personnel, total 45,000 (2020)
- Armed forces personnel 0.8% (2020)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 63.4 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 62.96 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Military expenditure 338.20 billion current LCU (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 33.5% (2025)
- Military expenditure 17.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Chad?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Chad was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Chad?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Chad?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- How does Chad rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Chad ranks 18th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Chad?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chad data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.