CPIA financial sector rating in Comoros
Comoros: CPIA financial sector rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA financial sector rating in Comoros, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Comoros recorded 2.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia financial sector rating in 2025.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Comoros peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2020.
Comoros ranks 53rd of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.25 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Comoros
- 53 Angola 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Gambia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Laos 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Mauritania 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Micronesia (country) 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Moldova 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Mozambique 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Sierra Leone 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Tajikistan 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 East Timor 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Comoros
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2012)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 80 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 72.94 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 18.2% (2025)
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved b 79.4% (2022)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure 40 scale 0-100 (2024)
- CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating 2 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector 2 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- IDA resource allocation index 2.67 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA debt policy rating 2.5 1=low to 6=high (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Comoros?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Comoros was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Comoros?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Comoros?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- How does Comoros rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Comoros ranks 53rd out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Comoros?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Comoros data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.