CPIA economic management cluster average in Moldova

Moldova: CPIA economic management cluster average was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
11th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA economic management cluster average in Moldova, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 4 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2019, cpia economic management cluster average in Moldova stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is up 9.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Moldova peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.33 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Moldova 11th out of 84 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.8 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.92 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 11 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 11 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 11 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 11 Grenada 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 11 Guyana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 11 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 11 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 11 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in Moldova?
Cpia economic management cluster average in Moldova was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Moldova rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
Moldova ranks 11th out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.