CPIA economic management cluster average in Cote d'Ivoire

Cote d'Ivoire: CPIA economic management cluster average was 4.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
4.33 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 4.0%
World rank
5th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
All-time low
1.83 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA economic management cluster average in Cote d'Ivoire, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 2 1=low to 6=high2006: 1.8 1=low to 6=high2007: 2.3 1=low to 6=high2008: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2010: 2.7 1=low to 6=high2011: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2025: 4.3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Cote d'Ivoire recorded 4.33 1=low to 6=high for cpia economic management cluster average in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.0% on the previous year and up 18.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Cote d'Ivoire peaked at 4.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 1.83 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 5th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.3 1=low to 6=high 1.83 1=low to 6=high 2.83 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.43 1=low to 6=high 2.67 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 4 1=low to 6=high 3.83 1=low to 6=high 4.33 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Cote d'Ivoire

  1. 2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 4 Azerbaijan 4.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 5 Samoa 4.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 7 Mauritania 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 7 Rwanda 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 7 Tanzania 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 7 Uzbekistan 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Cote d'Ivoire

All data for Cote d'Ivoire →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in Cote d'Ivoire?
Cpia economic management cluster average in Cote d'Ivoire was 4.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Cote d'Ivoire?
The highest recorded value was 4.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Cote d'Ivoire?
The lowest recorded value was 1.83 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Cote d'Ivoire rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 5th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Cote d'Ivoire?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Cote d'Ivoire data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.