CPIA economic management cluster average in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: CPIA economic management cluster average was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
1.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 12.5%
World rank
81st
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
1.17 1=low to 6=high
in 2023
Years of data
19
2006–2025

CPIA economic management cluster average in Afghanistan, 2006–2025

01232006201520252006: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 1.3 1=low to 6=high2023: 1.2 1=low to 6=high2024: 1.3 1=low to 6=high2025: 1.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia economic management cluster average in Afghanistan is 1.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

The figure is up 12.5% on the previous year and down 50.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Afghanistan peaked at 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 1.17 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.

That places Afghanistan 81st out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.26 1=low to 6=high 3.17 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 4
2010s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 1.67 1=low to 6=high 1.17 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 78 Malawi 1.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 78 Maldives 1.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 78 Yemen 1.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 81 Eritrea 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 81 South Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 81 Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in Afghanistan?
Cpia economic management cluster average in Afghanistan was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was 1.17 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
How does Afghanistan rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
Afghanistan ranks 81st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Afghanistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.