CPIA debt policy rating in Uganda
Uganda: CPIA debt policy rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA debt policy rating in Uganda, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia debt policy rating in Uganda stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of down 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Uganda peaked at 5 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2016.
That places Uganda 13th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.08 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
- 13 Armenia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Bangladesh 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Bhutan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Honduras 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Mali 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Nepal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Nigeria 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Tanzania 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Uganda
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Tax revenue 12.6% (2024)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 33.7% (2024)
- Taxes on goods and services 44.0% (2024)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 3.7% (2024)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -4.3% (2024)
- Interest payments 21.0% (2024)
- Grants and other revenue 13.2% (2024)
- Interest payments 19.5% (2023)
- Other taxes 0.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia debt policy rating in Uganda?
- Cpia debt policy rating in Uganda was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2016.
- How does Uganda rank for cpia debt policy rating?
- Uganda ranks 13th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).