CPIA debt policy rating in Small states

Small states: CPIA debt policy rating was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
3.06 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 2.8%
All-time high
3.53 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
2.93 1=low to 6=high
in 2023
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA debt policy rating in Small states, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Small states recorded 3.06 1=low to 6=high for cpia debt policy rating in 2025.

That represents a change of up 2.8% on the previous year and up 1.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Small states peaked at 3.53 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 2.93 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.45 1=low to 6=high 3.38 1=low to 6=high 3.53 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.07 1=low to 6=high 2.95 1=low to 6=high 3.38 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 2.98 1=low to 6=high 2.93 1=low to 6=high 3.06 1=low to 6=high 6

More public sector data for Small states

All data for Small states →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia debt policy rating in Small states?
Cpia debt policy rating in Small states was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Small states?
The highest recorded value was 3.53 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Small states?
The lowest recorded value was 2.93 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Small states?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Small states data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).