CPIA debt policy rating in Grenada
Grenada: CPIA debt policy rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA debt policy rating in Grenada, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia debt policy rating in Grenada is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 40.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Grenada peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2021 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.
That places Grenada 29th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Grenada
- 29 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Mauritania 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 East Timor 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 29 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Grenada
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 80 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Intentional homicides 13.67 per 100,000 people (2023)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 59.34 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 31.2% (2025)
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved b 106.5% (2022)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure 40 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Intentional homicides, male 25.53 per 100,000 male (2023)
- Intentional homicides, female 1.71 per 100,000 female (2023)
- CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating 3 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector 4 1=low to 6=high (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia debt policy rating in Grenada?
- Cpia debt policy rating in Grenada was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Grenada?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2021.
- What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Grenada?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- How does Grenada rank for cpia debt policy rating?
- Grenada ranks 29th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Grenada?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Grenada data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).