Control of Corruption - Governance score in Libya

Libya: Control of Corruption - Governance score was 16.85 0-100 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
16.85 0-100
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
195th
of 204 countries
All-time high
33.13 0-100
in 1996
All-time low
15.27 0-100
in 2017
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Control of Corruption - Governance score in Libya, 1996–2024

01020301996201020241996: 33.1 0-1001998: 33.1 0-1002000: 33 0-1002002: 26.5 0-1002003: 26.5 0-1002004: 25.3 0-1002005: 23.7 0-1002006: 23.7 0-1002007: 24.4 0-1002008: 25.3 0-1002009: 23.5 0-1002010: 23 0-1002011: 22.5 0-1002012: 25.3 0-1002013: 21.7 0-1002014: 18 0-1002015: 15.5 0-1002016: 15.5 0-1002017: 15.3 0-1002018: 17.2 0-1002019: 16.6 0-1002020: 17.1 0-1002021: 16.5 0-1002022: 16.8 0-1002023: 16.6 0-1002024: 16.9 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance score in Libya is 16.85 0-100, measured in 2024.

The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and down 6.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance score in Libya peaked at 33.13 0-100 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 15.27 0-100, in 2017.

That places Libya 195th out of 204 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 33.12 0-100 33.1 0-100 33.13 0-100 2
2000s 25.76 0-100 23.47 0-100 33.03 0-100 9
2010s 19.06 0-100 15.27 0-100 25.31 0-100 10
2020s 16.77 0-100 16.48 0-100 17.06 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 192 Burundi 18.25 0-100 compare
  2. 193 Equatorial Guinea 18.04 0-100 compare
  3. 194 Democratic Republic of Congo 17.18 0-100 compare
  4. 196 Haiti 16.68 0-100 compare
  5. 197 North Korea 16.33 0-100 compare
  6. 198 Sudan 16.33 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is control of corruption - governance score in Libya?
Control of corruption - governance score in Libya was 16.85 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest control of corruption - governance score recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 33.13 0-100 in 1996.
What is the lowest control of corruption - governance score recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 15.27 0-100 in 2017.
How does Libya rank for control of corruption - governance score?
Libya ranks 195th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
Is control of corruption - governance score rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).