Coal rents in Belarus
Belarus: Coal rents was 0.0% in 2021. ▬ Flat
Latest (2021)
0.0%
World rank
70th
of 199 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 1990
All-time low
0.0%
in 1990
Years of data
32
1990–2021
Coal rents in Belarus, 1990–2021
Source: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of GDP.
Analysis
In 2021, coal rents in Belarus stood at 0.0%. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.
Over the whole period, coal rents in Belarus peaked at 0.0% in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1990.
Belarus ranks 70th of 199 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 67 Argentina 0.0% compare
- 68 Chile 0.0% compare
- 69 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 70 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 70 American Samoa 0.0% compare
- 70 Angola 0.0% compare
- 70 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0% compare
- 70 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 70 Austria 0.0% compare
- 70 Azerbaijan 0.0% compare
- 70 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 70 Bahrain 0.0% compare
- 70 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 70 Belgium 0.0% compare
- 70 Belize 0.0% compare
- 70 Benin 0.0% compare
- 70 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 70 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 70 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 70 Brunei 0.0% compare
- 70 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 70 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 70 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 70 Cayman Islands 0.0% compare
- 70 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 70 Chad 0.0% compare
- 70 Comoros 0.0% compare
- 70 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.0% compare
- 70 Congo 0.0% compare
- 70 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
- 70 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 70 Croatia 0.0% compare
- 70 Cuba 0.0% compare
- 70 Curacao 0.0% compare
- 70 Cyprus 0.0% compare
- 70 Denmark 0.0% compare
- 70 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 70 Dominica 0.0% compare
- 70 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 70 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 70 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 70 El Salvador 0.0% compare
- 70 Equatorial Guinea 0.0% compare
- 70 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 70 Estonia 0.0% compare
- 70 Faroe Islands 0.0% compare
- 70 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 70 Finland 0.0% compare
- 70 France 0.0% compare
- 70 French Polynesia 0.0% compare
- 70 Gabon 0.0% compare
- 70 Gambia 0.0% compare
- 70 Ghana 0.0% compare
- 70 Greenland 0.0% compare
- 70 Grenada 0.0% compare
- 70 Guam 0.0% compare
- 70 Guatemala 0.0% compare
- 70 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 70 Guinea-Bissau 0.0% compare
- 70 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 70 Haiti 0.0% compare
- 70 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 70 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 70 Iceland 0.0% compare
- 70 Iraq 0.0% compare
- 70 Ireland 0.0% compare
- 70 Israel 0.0% compare
- 70 Italy 0.0% compare
- 70 Jamaica 0.0% compare
- 70 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 70 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 70 Kiribati 0.0% compare
- 70 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 70 Latvia 0.0% compare
- 70 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 70 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 70 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 70 Libya 0.0% compare
- 70 Lithuania 0.0% compare
- 70 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 70 Macao 0.0% compare
- 70 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 70 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 70 Mali 0.0% compare
- 70 Malta 0.0% compare
- 70 Mauritius 0.0% compare
- 70 Moldova 0.0% compare
- 70 Morocco 0.0% compare
- 70 Namibia 0.0% compare
- 70 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 70 New Caledonia 0.0% compare
- 70 Nicaragua 0.0% compare
- 70 Oman 0.0% compare
- 70 Panama 0.0% compare
- 70 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 70 Paraguay 0.0% compare
- 70 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 70 Puerto Rico 0.0% compare
- 70 Qatar 0.0% compare
- 70 Rwanda 0.0% compare
- 70 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 70 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0% compare
- 70 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 70 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 70 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 70 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 70 Singapore 0.0% compare
- 70 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 70 Somalia 0.0% compare
- 70 Spain 0.0% compare
- 70 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 70 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0% compare
- 70 Saint Lucia 0.0% compare
- 70 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 70 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 70 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 70 Sweden 0.0% compare
- 70 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 70 Syria 0.0% compare
- 70 East Timor 0.0% compare
- 70 Togo 0.0% compare
- 70 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 70 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 70 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 70 Turkmenistan 0.0% compare
- 70 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 70 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 70 United Arab Emirates 0.0% compare
- 70 Uruguay 0.0% compare
- 70 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 70 Palestine 0.0% compare
- 70 Yemen 0.0% compare
More environment data for Belarus
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) 9.95 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) 7.19 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) 3.26 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) 4.22 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Capture fisheries production 555 metric tons (2024)
- Aquaculture production 9,022 metric tons (2024)
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF 54.22 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita 5.94 t CO2e/capita (2024)
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) 23.94 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Carbon intensity of GDP 0.8712 kg CO2e per constant 2015 US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coal rents in Belarus?
- Coal rents in Belarus was 0.0% in 2021, according to The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest coal rents recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1990.
- What is the lowest coal rents recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1990.
- How does Belarus rank for coal rents?
- Belarus ranks 70th out of 199 countries with data for 2021.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as part of Coal rents (% of GDP). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Coal rents are the difference between the value of both hard and soft coal production at world prices and their total costs of production.