Health in Viet Nam 1,317 indicators covering health for Viet Nam. IndicatorLatest Year10-yr change Rank People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population): Q2 76.8% 2017 up 47.5% 37th People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population): Q3 92.0% 2017 up 37.7% 27th People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population): Q4 100.0% 2017 up 21.9% 1st People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population): Q5 98.2% 2017 up 4.0% 23rd People practicing open defecation (% of population): Q1 19.0% 2017 down 41.5% 48th People practicing open defecation (% of population): Q2 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 76th People practicing open defecation (% of population): Q3 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 68th People practicing open defecation (% of population): Q4 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 57th People practicing open defecation (% of population): Q5 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 47th People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) 80.9% 2017 up 18.5% 32nd People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) 91.0% 2017 up 11.7% 30th People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) 95.7% 2017 up 6.7% 28th People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) 97.8% 2017 up 4.6% 26th People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) 100.0% 2017 up 4.6% 1st People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of) 96.0% 2017 up 2.8% 37th People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of) 99.6% 2017 up 1.3% 20th People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of) 99.9% 2017 up 0.4% 21st People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of) 100.0% 2017 up 1.1% 10th People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of) 99.9% 2017 down 0.0% 17th People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural) 34.7% 2017 up 55.1% 45th People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural) 67.5% 2017 up 50.0% 33rd People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural) 83.1% 2017 up 38.2% 29th People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural) 96.7% 2017 up 36.2% 17th People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural) 99.0% 2017 up 13.5% 10th People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban) 67.9% 2017 up 18.7% 38th People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban) 89.7% 2017 up 2.9% 30th People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban) 96.1% 2017 up 1.7% 21st People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban) 96.6% 2017 down 0.0% 29th People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban) 98.2% 2017 down 0.1% 30th People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population): Q1 24.0% 2017 down 31.6% 49th People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population): Q2 2.8% 2017 down 84.7% 59th People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population): Q3 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 73rd People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population): Q4 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 70th People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population): Q5 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 54th People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population): Q1 7.0% 2017 down 46.2% 34th People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population): Q2 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 64th People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population): Q3 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 56th People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population): Q4 0.0% 2017 down 100.0% 48th People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population): Q5 0.0% 2017 — 42nd Population in areas that warrant treatment with antibiotics, facial 0 2025 — 23rd Sales of beer in 1000s hectolitres 23.92 2009 up 233.1% 84th Number of people operated for trachomatous trichiasis 224 2025 down 91.8% 17th Antenatal care (any skilled personnel) (% of women with a birth): Q1 81.3% 2014 up 20.1% 29th Antenatal care (any skilled personnel) (% of women with a birth): Q2 98.3% 2014 up 14.2% 7th Antenatal care (any skilled personnel) (% of women with a birth): Q3 99.7% 2014 up 6.5% 2nd Antenatal care (any skilled personnel) (% of women with a birth): Q4 100.0% 2014 up 7.1% 1st Antenatal care (any skilled personnel) (% of women with a birth): Q5 99.7% 2014 up 0.2% 6th Antenatal care (doctor) (% of women with a birth): Q1 69.5% 2014 up 138.0% 10th Antenatal care (doctor) (% of women with a birth): Q2 88.5% 2014 up 152.9% 7th Antenatal care (doctor) (% of women with a birth): Q3 92.3% 2014 up 152.9% 7th Antenatal care (doctor) (% of women with a birth): Q4 95.9% 2014 up 84.8% 5th Antenatal care (doctor) (% of women with a birth): Q5 97.9% 2014 up 11.4% 5th Children with a birth weight 96.6 2019 up 3.6% 40th Current use of contraception (modern method) (% of married women): Q1 61.2% 2014 up 5.7% 6th Current use of contraception (modern method) (% of married women): Q2 58.9% 2014 up 1.7% 8th Current use of contraception (modern method) (% of married women): Q3 55.7% 2014 down 4.1% 12th Current use of contraception (modern method) (% of married women): Q4 53.0% 2014 down 8.6% 15th Current use of contraception (modern method) (% of married women): Q5 56.7% 2014 up 9.9% 10th Current use of contraception (any method) (% of married women): Q1 72.6% 2014 down 2.3% 3rd Current use of contraception (any method) (% of married women): Q2 76.7% 2014 down 0.5% 2nd ← Previous Page 20 of 22 Next →