Pig meat production closely tracks pig fat output across countries.

Comparing Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) with Fat of pigs — Production across 150 countries, 1990–2024.

Rank correlation
+0.97
Holding size constant
+0.95
Countries compared
150
Period
1990–2024

What might link these

Both indicators are core outputs of pig farming, so high correlation is expected. However, GDP and population controls only slightly weaken the link, suggesting other shared drivers like regional dietary habits or agricultural policies.

Why this is not proof of anything

This is a correlation across countries, not an experiment. It cannot show that either indicator causes the other, and both may simply follow a third thing. Production volumes may be reported by the same agencies, creating an artificial inflation of agreement.

The second figure above repeats the measurement with national population and income held constant. It is the more conservative number: a relationship that largely disappears there was mostly telling you that larger, richer countries have more of most things.

How this was measured

Both indicators were ranked across every country reporting each, and the two rankings compared — ranks rather than raw values, because a handful of very large countries can otherwise manufacture a relationship on their own. The calculation is arithmetic over figures already published on this site; the commentary above is drafted from the two indicator names and the resulting coefficients.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under the original publisher’s licence; please keep the attribution.

<a href=""></a> — Statizoid