Belarus vs China: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Belarus
27.26 0-100
in 2024
China
27.91 0-100
in 2024
Belarus rank
194th
China rank
192nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Belarus
  • China
010203040199620102024

How they compare

China currently reports 27.91 0-100 against 27.26 0-100 in Belarus, a difference of 0.6515 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belarus ahead.

Globally, Belarus ranks 194th and China ranks 192nd of 206 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).