Grenada vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Grenada
- Mauritius
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.
Globally, Grenada ranks 76th and Mauritius ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.